U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2009

Interstate Protective Svcs. v. Nautilus Ins. Co.

Interstate Protective Svcs. v. Nautilus Ins. Co.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided May 6, 2009
Interstate Protective Svcs. v. Nautilus Ins. Co.

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 08-15413 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

MAY 6, 2009 Non-Argument Calendar

THOMAS K. KAHN ________________________ CLERK

D. C. Docket No. 07-01157-CV-CAP-1

INTERSTATE PROTECTIVE SERVICE, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant, versus

NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee. ________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia

_________________________

(May 6, 2009)

Before BLACK, CARNES and WILSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Interstate Protective Service, Inc. (IPS), appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Nautilus Insurance Company (Nautilus) and denial of IPS’s motion for partial summary judgment. Specifically, IPS argues the district court erred in finding its commercial liability insurance policy, issued by Nautilus, excluded coverage for damages arising from a January 2003 robbery of a money center that was guarded by IPS.

After a de novo review of the record and consideration of the parties’ briefs, we conclude the district court did not err in its grant of summary judgment to Nautilus and denial of IPS’s motion for partial summary judgment. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.