United States v. Kareem Jackson
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 08-16305 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JUNE 30, 2009 Non-Argument Calendar
THOMAS K. KAHN ________________________
CLERK D. C. Docket No. 06-20397-CR-UUB UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
KAREEM JACKSON, a.k.a. Jamar Fields, a.k.a. Face,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _________________________ (June 30, 2009)
Before CARNES, WILSON and COX, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Nathan D. Clark, appointed counsel for Kareem Jackson, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Jackson’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.