U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2009

United States v. Harry Lee Telfair

United States v. Harry Lee Telfair
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided June 26, 2009 · Dubina, Black, Barkett
333 F. App'x 485

United States v. Harry Lee Telfair

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Grant B. Smith, appointed counsel for Harry Lee Telfair in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). In considering counsel’s motion, we consider only the propriety of Telfair’s 2006 amended sentence at issue in this out-of-time direct appeal. We do not examine the propriety of any other actions Telfair has taken, or may take in the future. Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of this out-of-time direct appeal for Telfair’s 2006 amended sentence is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Telfair’s amended sentence is AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.