United States v. Adolfo Badillo
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JUNE 22, 2009 No. 08-15003 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
D. C. Docket No. 05-00380-CR-03-RWS-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
ADOLFO BADILLO, a.k.a. Guerro, a.k.a. Sobrino, a.k.a. La Guera,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
No. 08-15138
Non-Argument Calendar ________________________
D. C. Docket No. 07-00033-CR-1-RWS-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
ADOLFO PADILLO,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _________________________ (June 22, 2009)
Before: DUBINA, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT and COX, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
E. Vaughn Dunnigan, appointed counsel for Adolfo Badillo in these consolidated direct criminal appeals, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant, because, in her opinion, the appeals are without merit. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeals is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Badillo’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.