U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2009

United States v. Amber Battle

United States v. Amber Battle
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided June 11, 2009
United States v. Amber Battle

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 08-15745 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JUNE 11, 2009 Non-Argument Calendar

THOMAS K. KAHN ________________________

CLERK D. C. Docket No. 08-00049-CR-FTM-29-DNF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee, versus

AMBER BATTLE,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _________________________ (June 11, 2009)

Before BIRCH, HULL and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Charles M. Harris, appointed counsel for Amber Battle, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Battle’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.