United States v. Amber Battle
United States v. Amber Battle
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 08-15745 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JUNE 11, 2009 Non-Argument Calendar THOMAS K. KAHN ________________________ CLERK D. C. Docket No. 08-00049-CR-FTM-29-DNF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus AMBER BATTLE, Defendant-Appellant.
________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _________________________ (June 11, 2009) Before BIRCH, HULL and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Charles M. Harris, appointed counsel for Amber Battle, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Battle’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.