U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2009

United States v. Toye Dewayne Copeland

United States v. Toye Dewayne Copeland
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided August 27, 2009 · Tjoflat, Edmondson, Hill
331 F. App'x 716

United States v. Toye Dewayne Copeland

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Leonard E. Clark, appointed counsel for Toye Dewayne Copeland in this appeal from the district court’s order denying relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s denial of relief under § 3582(c)(2) is AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.