U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2009

United States v. Paul Esson

United States v. Paul Esson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided August 13, 2009

United States v. Paul Esson

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 08-17060 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT AUGUST 13, 2009 Non-Argument Calendar THOMAS K. KAHN ________________________ CLERK D. C. Docket No. 08-20517-CR-JAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PAUL ESSON, a.k.a. Curtis Campbell, Defendant-Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _________________________ (August 13, 2009) Before HULL, PRYOR and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: Howard J. Schumacher, appointed counsel for Paul Esson, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Esson’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.