U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2009

United States v. Ralph E. Brazel, Jr.

United States v. Ralph E. Brazel, Jr.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided November 24, 2009 · Barkett, Hull, Marcus, Per Curiam
353 F. App'x 389

United States v. Ralph E. Brazel, Jr.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Leonard E. Clark, appointed counsel for Ralph Brazel, Jr., has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the *390 entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s denial of § 3582(c)(2) relief is AFFIRMED. •

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.