U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2009

Reeves v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided May 29, 2009 · Barkett, Birch, Black, Carnes, Dubina, Edmondson, Hull, Marcus, Pryor, Tjoflat, Wilson

569 F.3d 1290; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 17658; 108 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 456; 2008 WL 6153721 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Douglas L. Micko, Sprenger & Lang, PLLC, Minneapolis, MN, Byron Renard Perkins, Cochran Firm, Birmingham, AL, Kell A. Simon, Ross Melton, PC, Austin, TX, Michael D. Lieder, Sprenger & Lang, PLLC, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellant., Margaret Campbell, Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart, P.C., Atlanta, GA, David Lynn Warren, Jr., Sandra B. Reiss, Christopher A. Mixon, Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart, P.C., Birmingham, AL, for Defendant-Appellee.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Reeves v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (11th Cir. 2010)
Reeves v. CH Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (11th Cir. 2009)
Blizzard v. APPLIANCE DIRECT, INC. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

BY THE COURT:

A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion *1291of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.