United States v. Purdue
United States v. Purdue
325 F. App'x 813
United States v. Purdue
Opinion of the Court
Randolph Murrell, appointed counsel for Shelton Purdue, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the decision of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.