U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2009

United States v. Purdue

United States v. Purdue
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided April 29, 2009
325 F. App'x 813

United States v. Purdue

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Randolph Murrell, appointed counsel for Shelton Purdue, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the decision of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.