U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2009

United States v. Upshaw

United States v. Upshaw
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided July 24, 2009 · Carnes, Hill, Pryor
329 F. App'x 898

United States v. Upshaw

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Darlene M. Geiger, appointed counsel for Clayton K. Upshaw, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of *899merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s denial of Upshaw’s motion to reduce his sentence, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), is AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.