Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2009

Great American Insurance v. National Union Fire Insurance

Great American Insurance v. National Union Fire Insurance
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided July 20, 2009 · Black, Edmondson, Siler
339 F. App'x 896

Great American Insurance v. National Union Fire Insurance

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

We affirm the judgment of the district court. Briefly stated, General Asphalt was not covered as an additional insured under the policies issued to Bob’s by National or Lexington because the underlying injuries for which General Asphalt was potentially liable did not arise out of Bob’s work. Therefore, Great American Insurance Company was not due reimbursement from National.1

AFFIRMED.

. Moreover, Defendant Lexington did not have a duty to defend General Asphalt because the complaint did not allege injuries that would bring it into coverage under Lexington’s policy. In addition, because we affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment, we need not address Defendant National’s cross-appeal.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑