U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2010

United States v. Eneyda Romero Molina

United States v. Eneyda Romero Molina
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided May 20, 2010 · Marcus, Wilson, Anderson
379 F. App'x 911

United States v. Eneyda Romero Molina

Opinion

*912 PER CURIAM:

David Marshall, appointed counsel for Eneyda Romero Molina in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Molina’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.