United States v. Tavares Middlebrooks
United States v. Tavares Middlebrooks
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
No. 09-14374 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
JULY 26, 2010
Non-Argument Calendar
JOHN LEY
________________________
CLERK
D. C. Docket No. 07-00018-CR-HL-5 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus TAVARES MIDDLEBROOKS, a.k.a. Snoop,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Georgia
_________________________
(July 26, 2010) Before EDMONDSON, MARTIN and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
John R. Francisco, appointed counsel for Tavares Middlebrooks, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Middlebrooks’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished