United States v. Reginald Holsey

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
United States v. Reginald Holsey, 392 F. App'x 805 (11th Cir. 2010)

United States v. Reginald Holsey

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Phillip Horowitz, appointed counsel for Reginald Holsey in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. The final judgment, however, contains a clerical error, in that it specifies that Holsey’s conviction on Count Eleven is for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine, instead of cocaine base. Therefore, we REMAND IN PART WITH INSTRUCTIONS to correct the clerical error on the final judgment. In all other respects, however, independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is therefore GRANTED, and Holsey’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Reginald HOLSEY, A.K.A. Cornbread, A.K.A. CB, Defendant-Appellant
Status
Unpublished