United States v. Herman Reece Odom, Jr., a.k.a. \Scooter\""

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Herman Reece Odom, Jr., a.k.a. \Scooter\""

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-11104 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Non-Argument Calendar AUGUST 24, 2010

________________________ JOHN LEY

CLERK

D.C. Docket No. 1:09-cr-00201-CG-C-1 USA, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus HERMAN REECE ODOM, JR., a.k.a. "Scooter", lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Alabama

________________________

(August 24, 2010) Before BLACK, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

William Gregory Hughes, appointed counsel for Herman Reece Odom, Jr., has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Odom’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished