U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2010

United States v. Herman Reece Odom, Jr., a.k.a. \Scooter\""

United States v. Herman Reece Odom, Jr., a.k.a. \Scooter\""
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided August 24, 2010

United States v. Herman Reece Odom, Jr., a.k.a. \Scooter\""

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-11104 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar AUGUST 24, 2010 ________________________ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 1:09-cr-00201-CG-C-1 USA, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

HERMAN REECE ODOM, JR., a.k.a. "Scooter", lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama ________________________ (August 24, 2010) Before BLACK, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: William Gregory Hughes, appointed counsel for Herman Reece Odom, Jr., has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Odom’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.