U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2010

United States v. Harold

United States v. Harold
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided September 22, 2010 · Barkett, Hull, Fay
397 F. App'x 542

United States v. Harold

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Maurice C. Grant, II, appointed counsel for Claude N. Harold in this appeal from the revocation of Harold’s supervised release and subsequent imposition of an 11-month sentence, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the revocation of Harold’s supervised release and his sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.