United States v. Phillip Karl Prescott

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Phillip Karl Prescott

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

OCTOBER 27, 2010

No. 10-11093 JOHN LEY

Non-Argument Calendar CLERK

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 8:07-cr-00471-SDM-AEP-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus PHILLIP KARL PRESCOTT,

Defendant-Appellant.

__________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(October 27, 2010) Before BLACK, MARTIN and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

A. Fitzgerald Hall, appointed counsel for Phillip Karl Prescott, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguably meritorious issues, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Prescott’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished