U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2010

Gilbert v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided November 3, 2010 · Dubina, Tjoflat, Edmondson, Black, Carnes, Barkett, Hull, Marcus, Pryor, Martin

625 F.3d 716; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 23357; 2010 WL 4340970 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

George Allen Couture, Stephen J. Langs, Rosemary T. Cakmis, Fed. Pub. Defenders, Orlando, FL, for Gilbert., Michael A. Rotker, U.S. Dept, of Justice, Crim. Div., Washington, DC, David Paul Rhodes, U.S. Atty., Linda Julin McNamara, Asst. U.S. Atty., Tampa, FL, for U.S.

Cases that cite this one

6 later published cases cite this decision.

Darden v. Stephens (4th Cir. 2011)
Ezell Gilbert v. United States (11th Cir. 2011)
Ntow v. United States (District Court, E.D. Missouri 2019)
Gilbert v. United States (11th Cir. 2011)
Sun Bear v. United States (8th Cir. 2011)
Kevin Norris Guyton v. United States (11th Cir. 2011)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.