United States v. Garnica

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
United States v. Garnica, 404 F. App'x 359 (11th Cir. 2010)

United States v. Garnica

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Daniel L. Castillo, appointed counsel for Pascual Garnica in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Garnica’s conviction and sentence under Count One are AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pascual GARNICA, Defendant-Appellant
Status
Unpublished