United States v. Bole

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Bole

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FILED

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS

U.S.

________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

DEC 08, 2010

No. 10-10329 JOHN LEY

Non-Argument Calendar CLERK

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 2:02-cr-00374-LSC-TMP-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MICHAEL GLENN BOLE, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Alabama

________________________

(December 8, 2010) Before TJOFLAT, HULL and MARTIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

James L. O’Kelley, appointed counsel for Michael Glenn Bole, filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bole’s revocation of supervised release and sentence are AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished