U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2010

United States v. Bole

United States v. Bole
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided December 8, 2010

United States v. Bole

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS U.S. ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT DEC 08, 2010 No. 10-10329 JOHN LEY Non-Argument Calendar CLERK ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 2:02-cr-00374-LSC-TMP-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MICHAEL GLENN BOLE, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama ________________________ (December 8, 2010) Before TJOFLAT, HULL and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: James L. O’Kelley, appointed counsel for Michael Glenn Bole, filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bole’s revocation of supervised release and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.