U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2010

United States v. Humberto Pisa-Bentancur

United States v. Humberto Pisa-Bentancur
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided December 17, 2010 · Edmondson, Black, Pryor
406 F. App'x 344

United States v. Humberto Pisa-Bentancur

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Humberto Pisa-Bentancur (Defendant) appeals his total 24-month sentence for conspiring to transport at least six illegal aliens within the United States, transporting six illegal aliens within the United States, being an alien in the United States without the consent of the U.S. Attorney General after deportation, and entering the United States at a place not designated. The district court heard Defendant’s arguments about Mexico, his family circumstances, and lack of criminal history. Defendant’s sentence was not substantively unreasonable, as the district court acted within its discretion in determining that a 24-month total sentence, which was the lowest possible guideline range sentence, was sufficient, but not greater than necessary, to comply with the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.