U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2010

Mahala Ault v. Walt Disney World Co.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided December 14, 2010 · Wilson, Pryor, Anderson

405 F. App'x 401

Counsel

Christopher A. Pace, Bernard H. Dempsey, Jr., Thomas Wade Young, Dempsey & Associates, P.A., Winter Park, FL, John A. Baker, J. Phillip Krajewski, Springfield, IL, for Plaintiffs-Appellants., Kerry Alan Scanlon, Jeremy M. White, Washington, DC, David Ferleger, David Ferleger Law Office, Jenkintown, PA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Kuhr v. Mayo Clinic Jacksonville (United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida 2020)
C.J.J. v. Walt Disney Parks & Resorts U.S., Inc. (United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida 2016)
Jerry Miller v. Walt Disney World Co. (11th Cir. 2012)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

After oral argument and careful consideration, we conclude for the reasons fully discussed at oral argument that the district court erred in concluding that the named plaintiffs lacked prudential standing. The interests sought to be protected by the named plaintiffs are arguably within the zone of interest protected by 42 U.S.C. § 12182.

Accordingly, we vacate the judgment of the district court and remand for further proceedings, including inter alia a determination as to whether the claims of the named plaintiffs are typical of the claims of the class and whether they are adequate representatives of the class.

VACATED and REMANDED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.