U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2010

United States v. Parnell

United States v. Parnell
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided December 9, 2010 · Edmondson, Carnes, Pryor
404 F. App'x 455

United States v. Parnell

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Neil L. Hanley, appointed counsel for Kenneth Parnell in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Parnell’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.