United States v. Garnica
United States v. Garnica
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED
________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-10578 DEC 02, 2010
Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY
CLERK
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cr-00349-JSM-TGW-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, llllllllll lllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus PASCAUL GARNICA,
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(December 2, 2010) Before BARKETT, MARCUS and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
Daniel L. Castillo, appointed counsel for Pascaul Garnica in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Garnica’s conviction and sentence under Count One are AFFIRMED.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished