United States v. Garnica

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Garnica

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED

________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-10578 DEC 02, 2010

Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY

CLERK

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cr-00349-JSM-TGW-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, llllllllll lllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus PASCAUL GARNICA,

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(December 2, 2010) Before BARKETT, MARCUS and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Daniel L. Castillo, appointed counsel for Pascaul Garnica in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Garnica’s conviction and sentence under Count One are AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished