United States v. Garnica
United States v. Garnica
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 10-10578 DEC 02, 2010 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY CLERK ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cr-00349-JSM-TGW-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, llllllllll lllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
PASCAUL GARNICA, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.
________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ________________________ (December 2, 2010) Before BARKETT, MARCUS and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Daniel L. Castillo, appointed counsel for Pascaul Garnica in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Garnica’s conviction and sentence under Count One are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.