United States v. Emmett Jackson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Emmett Jackson

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FILED

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUITU.S. COURT OF APPEALS

________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

DEC 01, 2010

No. 09-16169 JOHN LEY

Non-Argument Calendar CLERK

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 09-00048-CR-1-KD-C UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus EMMETT JACKSON, a.k.a. Chico,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Alabama

_________________________

(December 1, 2010) Before BLACK, WILSON and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Arthur J. Madden III, appointed counsel for Emmett Jackson in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Jackson’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished