United States v. Emmett Jackson
United States v. Emmett Jackson
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUITU.S. COURT OF APPEALS ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT DEC 01, 2010 No. 09-16169 JOHN LEY Non-Argument Calendar CLERK ________________________ D. C. Docket No. 09-00048-CR-1-KD-C UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus EMMETT JACKSON, a.k.a. Chico, Defendant-Appellant.
________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _________________________ (December 1, 2010) Before BLACK, WILSON and FAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Arthur J. Madden III, appointed counsel for Emmett Jackson in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Jackson’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.