Edward P. Manturuck v. Richard M. Meeks

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Edward P. Manturuck v. Richard M. Meeks

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

FILED

_____________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

SEPTEMBER 14, 2010

No. 10-10193

Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY

CLERK

_____________

D.C. Docket No. 2:09-cv-00079-AAA-JEG EDWARD P. MANTURUCK,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus RICHARD M. MEEKS, Georgia State Trooper,

Defendant-Appellee.

__________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Georgia

__________________________

(September 14, 2010) Before CARNES, MARCUS and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

We have carefully reviewed the record and briefs. We conclude that the district court correctly dismissed the complaint.

The statements of conclusions without fact averments do not and did not meet the plausibility standard of Randall v. Scott, 610 F.3d 701 (11th Cir. 2010).

Appellant did not and has not moved for permission to amend the complaint. No amendment was filed or proffered.

AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished