U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2010

Edward P. Manturuck v. Richard M. Meeks

Edward P. Manturuck v. Richard M. Meeks
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided September 14, 2010

Edward P. Manturuck v. Richard M. Meeks

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _____________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT SEPTEMBER 14, 2010 No. 10-10193 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY CLERK _____________ D.C. Docket No. 2:09-cv-00079-AAA-JEG

EDWARD P. MANTURUCK, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus

RICHARD M. MEEKS, Georgia State Trooper, Defendant-Appellee.

__________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia __________________________ (September 14, 2010) Before CARNES, MARCUS and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: We have carefully reviewed the record and briefs. We conclude that the district court correctly dismissed the complaint.

The statements of conclusions without fact averments do not and did not meet the plausibility standard of Randall v. Scott, 610 F.3d 701 (11th Cir. 2010).

Appellant did not and has not moved for permission to amend the complaint. No amendment was filed or proffered.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.