U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2010

United States v. Michael Singletary

United States v. Michael Singletary
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided March 18, 2010

United States v. Michael Singletary

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUITU.S. COURT OF APPEALS ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT MAR 18, 2010 No. 09-10680 JOHN LEY Non-Argument Calendar CLERK ________________________ D. C. Docket No. 08-80073-CR-DTKH UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MICHAEL SINGLETARY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _________________________ (March 18, 2010) Before BARKETT, HULL and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: Michael B. Cohen, counsel for Michael Singletary in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Singletary’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.