U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2010

United States v. Jermaine Garfield Kerr

United States v. Jermaine Garfield Kerr
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided March 9, 2010
United States v. Jermaine Garfield Kerr

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 09-12183 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT MARCH 9, 2010 Non-Argument Calendar

JOHN LEY ________________________

CLERK D. C. Docket No. 04-00177-CR-J-25-HTS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee, versus

JERMAINE GARFIELD KERR,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

No. 09-12184

Non-Argument Calendar ________________________

D. C. Docket No. 04-00252-CR-J-25-HTS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee, versus

JERMAINE GARFIELD KERR,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _________________________ (March 9, 2010)

Before BARKETT, HULL and COX, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Gerald S. Bettman, appointed counsel for Jermaine Garfield Kerr in these two direct criminal appeals, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant in both cases and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeals is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw from both appeals is GRANTED, and Kerr’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.