United States v. Jermaine Garfield Kerr
United States v. Jermaine Garfield Kerr
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 09-12183 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT MARCH 9, 2010 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY ________________________ CLERK D. C. Docket No. 04-00177-CR-J-25-HTS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JERMAINE GARFIELD KERR, Defendant-Appellant.
________________________ No. 09-12184 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D. C. Docket No. 04-00252-CR-J-25-HTS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JERMAINE GARFIELD KERR, Defendant-Appellant.
________________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _________________________ (March 9, 2010) Before BARKETT, HULL and COX, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Gerald S. Bettman, appointed counsel for Jermaine Garfield Kerr in these two direct criminal appeals, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant in both cases and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeals is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw from both appeals is GRANTED, and Kerr’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.