United States v. Ronald Eugene Mathis

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
United States v. Ronald Eugene Mathis, 361 F. App'x 986 (11th Cir. 2010)

United States v. Ronald Eugene Mathis

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Leonard E. Clark, appointed counsel for Ronald Mathis in this appeal of the denial of a motion for a reduced sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3282(c)(2), has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant, because, in his opinion, the appeal is without merit. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s denial of Mathis’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582 motion is AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald Eugene MATHIS, A.K.A. Romeo, Defendant-Appellant
Status
Unpublished