U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2010

United States v. George Pearson, Jr.

United States v. George Pearson, Jr.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided January 13, 2010 · Edmondson, Black, Anderson
361 F. App'x 66

United States v. George Pearson, Jr.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Leonard E. Clark, appointed counsel for George Pearson, Jr. in this appeal of the denial of a motion to reduce sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c), has filed a motion to withdraw, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396,18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issue of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the denial of the motion to reduce sentence is AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.