United States v. Oscar Lynden Knowles
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT January 7, 2010 JOHN LEY No. 09-12890 ACTING CLERK Non-Argument Calendar ________________________
D. C. Docket No. 04-14033-CR-DLG
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
OSCAR LYNDEN KNOWLES, d.b.a. Lindy,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _________________________ (January 7, 2010)
Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Jonathan Pinoli, appointed counsel for Oscar Lynden Knowles, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s denial of Knowles’s motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) is AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.