U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2010

Gilbert v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided July 1, 2010 · Dubina, Hill, Martin

610 F.3d 716; 2010 WL 2612358 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

George Allen Couture, Stephen J. Langs and Rosemary T. Cakmis, Fed. Pub. Defenders, Orlando, FL, for Gilbert., Michael A. Rotker, U.S. Dept, of Justice, Crim. Div., Washington, DC, David Paul Rhodes and Linda Julin McNamara, Tampa, FL, for U.S.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Gregory King v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium (11th Cir. 2014)
Scott v. United States (United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida 2010)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

BY THE COURT:

Presently before the court are:

1. Motion by Defendant/Appellant Gilbert for Release Pending Appeal/Remand;

*7172. United States’ Response to Gilbert’s Motion for Release Pending Appeal/Remand;

3. United States’ Unopposed Motion for Immediate Stay of the Mandate Pending Final Disposition of Possible Petition for Rehearing En Banc; and,

4. Appellant Gilbert’s Response to the Government’s Motion to Stay the Mandate.

We deal with these motions and responses as follows:

1. Defendani/Appellant Gilbert’s Motion for Release Pending Appeal/Remand is GRANTED. The motion and this order are remanded to the district court for the district court, expeditiously, to impose conditions, if any, upon Gilbert’s release.

2. Inasmuch as a judge of this Court has caused the mandate to be held, the Government’s motion for immediate stay of the mandate is DENIED, AS MOOT.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.