U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2010

Societe Nationale D'Industries Nutritive, S.A.E. v. Coca-Cola Co.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided November 17, 2010 · Black, Cox, Martin

410 F. App'x 179

Counsel

Elizabeth Grace Eager, Edward B. Krugman, Bondurant, Mixson & Elmore, LLC, Atlanta, GA, Eric L. Lewis, Anne Katherine Toomey, John Edward Thompson, Baach, Robinson & Lewis, PLLC, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellant., Jeffrey Scott Cashdan, Benjamin Lee, L. Joseph Loveland, King & Spalding, Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellee.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Foster v. Professional Guardian Services Corp. (Alaska 2011)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Societe Nationale D’lndustries Nutritive, S.A.E. (SONUT), appeals the district court’s grant of The Coca-Cola Company’s motion to stay in case No. 09-10942 and denial of SONUT’s motion to reconsider in case No. 09-15284. The district court granted the motion to stay under the doctrine of international abstention and, pursuant to the same doctrine, denied the motion to reconsider. Based upon our review of the record, the briefs, oral argument, and the district court’s well-reasoned opinion, we conclude the district court did not err in its decision to grant Coca-Cola’s motion to stay, nor did it err in denying SONUT’s motion to reconsider.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.