Gary W. Nash v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Gary W. Nash v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ____________________________U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JANUARY 7, 2011 No. 10-11923 JOHN LEY Non-Argument Calendar CLERK ____________________________

D.C. Docket No. 8:07-cv-01779-EAK-TGW

GARY W. NASH, BEVERLY J. NASH, his wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC., DIVINE PROVIDENCE, INC., d/b/a Divine Providence Food Bank/America’s Second Harvest of Tampa Bay, WILLIAM H. MILES,

Defendants-Appellees. ______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ______________________________

(January 7, 2011)

Before BLACK, WILSON, and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from the grant of defendants’s/appellees’s, Publix Super

Markets, Inc. (Publix), and Divine Providence, Inc., d/b/a Divine Providence Food

Bank/America’s Second Harvest of Tampa Bay (Divine Providence), motions for

summary judgment against plaintiffs/appellants, Gary W. Nash (Nash) and

Beverly J. Nash, on their claims for malicious prosecution and loss of consortium.

The claims arose from a prior criminal prosecution of Nash by the Office of State

Attorney on a 161-count indictment for grand theft, dealing in stolen property,

organized fraud, conspiracy to commit RICO violation, and RICO violation, of

which, in a non-jury trial, Nash was found not guilty on all counts.

We have reviewed the record in this appeal, the briefs and the arguments of

counsel. Finding no error, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished