United States v. Diaz-Acosta

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Diaz-Acosta

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FILED

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS

U.S.

________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

JAN 07, 2011

No. 10-11118 JOHN LEY

Non-Argument Calendar CLERK

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cr-00292-JSM-MAP-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CARLOS MIGUEL DIAZ-ACOSTA, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(January 7, 2011) Before TJOFLAT, HULL and MARTIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Howard C. Anderson, appointed counsel for Carlos Diaz-Acosta, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Diaz-Acosta’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished