United States v. Diaz-Acosta
United States v. Diaz-Acosta
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS U.S. ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JAN 07, 2011 No. 10-11118 JOHN LEY Non-Argument Calendar CLERK ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cr-00292-JSM-MAP-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CARLOS MIGUEL DIAZ-ACOSTA, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.
________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ________________________ (January 7, 2011) Before TJOFLAT, HULL and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Howard C. Anderson, appointed counsel for Carlos Diaz-Acosta, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Diaz-Acosta’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.