U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2011

United States v. Mitchell Kent Jackson

United States v. Mitchell Kent Jackson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided February 2, 2011 · Edmondson, Marcus, Per Curiam, Pryor
412 F. App'x 223

United States v. Mitchell Kent Jackson

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Robert Ratliff, appointed counsel for Mitchell Kent Jackson, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Jackson’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.