U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2011

United States v. Philip D. Smith

United States v. Philip D. Smith
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided February 11, 2011 · Black, Wilson, Fay
414 F. App'x 247

United States v. Philip D. Smith

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Michael Trost, appointed counsel for Phillip Smith, in this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation of the appellant, because counsel believes that the appeal is without merit. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguably meritorious issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Smith’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.