Gary W. Nash v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Gary W. Nash v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc., 417 F. App'x 879 (11th Cir. 2011)

Gary W. Nash v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from the grant of defendants’s/appellees’s, Publix Super Markets, Inc. (Publix), and Divine Provi *880 dence, Inc., d/b/a Divine Providence Food Bank/America’s Second Harvest of Tampa Bay (Divine Providence), motions for summary judgment against plaintiffs/appellants, Gary W. Nash (Nash) and Beverly J. Nash, on their claims for malicious prosecution and loss of consortium. The claims arose from a prior criminal prosecution of Nash by the Office of State Attorney on a 161-count indictment for grand theft, dealing in stolen property, organized fraud, conspiracy to commit RICO violation, and RICO violation, of which, in a non-jury trial, Nash was found not guilty on all counts.

We have reviewed the record in this appeal, the briefs and the arguments of counsel. Finding no error, we affirm the judgment of the district court. 1

AFFIRMED.

1

. The earlier order of the district judge, dated July 7, 2008, holding that William H. Miles was entitled to qualified immunity, and referenced on page 12 of the final order on appeal, dated March 26, 2010, is correct and affirmed as well.

Reference

Full Case Name
Gary W. NASH, Beverly J. Nash, His Wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC., Divine Providence, Inc., D.B.A. Divine Providence Food Bank/America’s Second Harvest of Tampa Bay, William H. Miles, Defendants-Appellees
Status
Unpublished