U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2011

Gary W. Nash v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc.

Gary W. Nash v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided March 14, 2011 · Tjoflat, Wilson, Hill
417 F. App'x 879

Gary W. Nash v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from the grant of defendants’s/appellees’s, Publix Super Markets, Inc. (Publix), and Divine Provi *880 dence, Inc., d/b/a Divine Providence Food Bank/America’s Second Harvest of Tampa Bay (Divine Providence), motions for summary judgment against plaintiffs/appellants, Gary W. Nash (Nash) and Beverly J. Nash, on their claims for malicious prosecution and loss of consortium. The claims arose from a prior criminal prosecution of Nash by the Office of State Attorney on a 161-count indictment for grand theft, dealing in stolen property, organized fraud, conspiracy to commit RICO violation, and RICO violation, of which, in a non-jury trial, Nash was found not guilty on all counts.

We have reviewed the record in this appeal, the briefs and the arguments of counsel. Finding no error, we affirm the judgment of the district court. 1

AFFIRMED.

1

. The earlier order of the district judge, dated July 7, 2008, holding that William H. Miles was entitled to qualified immunity, and referenced on page 12 of the final order on appeal, dated March 26, 2010, is correct and affirmed as well.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.