U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2011

United States v. Jose Carreno

United States v. Jose Carreno
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided April 5, 2011 · Black, Edmondson, Per Curiam, Wilson
422 F. App'x 768

United States v. Jose Carreno

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Hector Flores, appointed counsel for Jose Carreno in this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation of the appellant, because counsel believes that the appeal is without merit. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguably meritorious issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Carreno’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.