U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2011

Adolfus O'Brien Giles vs Wal-Mart Stores, East, LP

Adolfus O'Brien Giles vs Wal-Mart Stores, East, LP
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided May 16, 2011

Adolfus O'Brien Giles vs Wal-Mart Stores, East, LP

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-15196 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar MAY 16, 2011 ________________________ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 3:10-cv-00042-CDL ADOLFUS O’BRIEN GILES, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellant, versus WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellee.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia ________________________ (May 16, 2011) Before TJOFLAT, CARNES and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: Adolfus Giles appeals pro se the dismissal with prejudice of his complaint of employment discrimination against Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. The district court ruled that Giles’s complaint is barred by res judicata. Giles filed, in the same court, the same complaint against the same defendant a year earlier, and we affirmed the dismissal of that complaint. Giles v. Wal-Mart Distribution Ctr., No. 09-14223 (11th Cir. Dec. 28, 2009). Giles’s second complaint is clearly barred by res judicata. We affirm.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.