U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2011

United States v. Herdis Neal Brown

United States v. Herdis Neal Brown
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided May 20, 2011 · Hull, Pryor, Anderson
426 F. App'x 877

United States v. Herdis Neal Brown

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jonathan Dingus, appointed counsel for Herdis Neal Brown in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Brown’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.