United States v. Tim James
United States v. Tim James
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 11-10530 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT DECEMBER 7, 2011 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY ________________________ CLERK D.C. Docket No. 9:10-cr-80106-DMM-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus TIM JAMES, a.k.a. Tim Jones, a.k.a. Ian Kanroy Mcknight, a.k.a. Howard Morrison, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.
________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida ________________________ (December 7, 2011) Before TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON and CARNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Howard Greitzer, appointed counsel for Tim James in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and James’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.