U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2011

Hartford Casualty Insurance Company v. Intrastate Construction Corp.

Hartford Casualty Insurance Company v. Intrastate Construction Corp.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided November 22, 2011

Hartford Casualty Insurance Company v. Intrastate Construction Corp.

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ FILED No. 11-10842 U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT NOVEMBER 22, 2011 JOHN LEY D. C. Docket No. 0:10-cv-61064-JEM CLERK HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellee, versus INTRASTATE CONSTRUCTION CORP., a Florida corporation, LISA BISOGNO, a Florida resident, PETER BISOGNO, a Florida resident, Defendants-Counter Claimants-Appellants. _______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _________________________ (November 22, 2011) Before HULL, MARCUS and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: Appellants argue, on this interlocutory appeal, that the district court abused its discretion in granting Appellee’s request for a preliminary injunction.

After a thorough review of the briefs, record, and having had the benefit of oral argument, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in granting the preliminary injunction. We do not decide the ultimate issue of whether Appellee will prevail.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.