U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2011

United States v. Jeffrey Friedlander

United States v. Jeffrey Friedlander
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided October 28, 2011 · Edmondson, Martin, Kravitch
446 F. App'x 157

United States v. Jeffrey Friedlander

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Benjamin Singerman, appointed counsel for Jeffrey Friedlander, in this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation of the appellant, because counsel believes that the appeal is without merit. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguably meritorious issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Friedlander’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.